Contact Information
To request more information on how PIC can make you an instrument pilot, please call 1-800-435-9437 (1-800-I-FLY-IFR) or fill in all information below and select “submit”.
PIC was perfect for me, because of my busy schedule.
. . . Finally, someone has written a book that makes IFR flying easily understandable.
You instilled in me the confidence to fly safely in IFR conditions. For this I am very grateful.
My local examiner said the PIC graduates that he had examined were some of the best IFR pilots he’s had.
I spent less using PIC than I would have with the local CFII on a hit or miss basis over many months.
… the convenience of training at home is worth quite a bit. You worked around my schedule instead of my working around yours, as I would have with the local CFII.
. . . best bargain encountered in years. The final cost, all things considered, was less than a more traditional approach to IFR.
I am confident in my instrument skills and have put them to much use. Thanks again.
. . . lucid and easy to follow, the content is comprehensive and arranged in a logical sequence. Regardless of one’s experience level, it will be of benefit.
You instilled in me the confidence to fly safely in IFR conditions. For this I am very grateful.
My local examiner said the PIC graduates that he had examined were some of the best IFR pilots he’s had.
I am confident in my instrument skills and have put them to much use. Thanks again.
. . . Finally, someone has written a book that makes IFR flying easily understandable.
PIC was perfect for me, because of my busy schedule.
I spent less using PIC than I would have with the local CFII on a hit or miss basis over many months.
… the convenience of training at home is worth quite a bit. You worked around my schedule instead of my working around yours, as I would have with the local CFII.
. . . lucid and easy to follow, the content is comprehensive and arranged in a logical sequence. Regardless of one’s experience level, it will be of benefit.
. . . best bargain encountered in years. The final cost, all things considered, was less than a more traditional approach to IFR.